|
Post by Zoom on Jun 23, 2014 21:24:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by sapphire on Jun 24, 2014 22:53:31 GMT -6
This is pretty awesome. It would be interesting if they found a way to track brain patterns throughout the writing process, too. They did people thinking up a plot, and they did people continuing a story with a couple of sentences to start them off, but I wonder if anything would change if they gave them more time to plan, or let them start their own story.
"It’s possible that the novices are watching their stories like a film inside their heads, while the writers are narrating it with an inner voice." It's honestly kind of scary how that tracks my process. I used to "watch" my stories as I wrote them, and as I spent more time in writing classes and worked on my writing process, I started watching less and narrating more, if that makes sense. Not that I think watching it in your head is a bad strategy. Just doesn't work for me anymore. (Unless I need a good description - then I tend to close my eyes and picture it until I find the right words.)
|
|
|
Post by Raphael on Jun 25, 2014 19:09:38 GMT -6
Dang. That means I have to actually start writing...
|
|
|
Post by sapphire on Jun 25, 2014 20:41:05 GMT -6
Practice, practice, practice.
|
|
|
Post by Zoom on Jun 26, 2014 22:57:09 GMT -6
Yeah and we might learn some really cool stuff about writing if we knew how it actually worked!
Interesting about the difference between novices and experienced writers - I'm a novice writer, but I've noticed that kind of pattern in other aspects of life. When I first learned to drive a standard, literally all my effort was focused on not stalling it. Navigation and safety came later.
I wonder if really experienced writers could write out a book in real time without editing? Because they've exercised both the flow-of-events skill and the best-way-to-write-it-down skill. Maybe writers of a certain kind; I suspect every one is different. Which I also think is pretty cool - two comparable books might have been written with completely different methods. I think that's what I like so much about creative fields; they're the only ones that really allow different methods. I mean there's really only one way to build a house; you can't do any of the trim before you've put up the walls.
And Raph yes, yes we should write more! We should do everything more, all the time.
|
|
|
Post by sapphire on Jun 28, 2014 14:32:36 GMT -6
To go along with that car analogy - I think the most basic aspect of writing fiction (or narrative nonfiction) is knowing how to tell a story. If you can put characters into settings and tell a compelling story, you're more than halfway there. The mechanics of it will come with practice, but I honestly don't think there's a way to teach storytelling.
It would be an interesting experiment, to see if people could just write a book in real time like that. I can't imagine doing it myself - I'm a slow, slow writer, for starters, but I'm also fairly tied to my outlines at this point. I don't do much freeform writing anymore. Although I remember reading somewhere, about one author (whose name I don't remember, but I'm pretty sure they were fairly famous - super specific, I know), that they always submitted the first draft of a story, no edits.
It is kind of great how creative processes like writing are all so different. Every single writer does things a little bit differently, and there's so much room for interpretation.
|
|